"We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low wage job," Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in dissent.

As more litigators actively implement artificial intelligence into their practices, at least one early adopter is now suggesting lawyers pump the brakes to avoid being outpaced by the rapid evolution of AI technology.

"Because of the importance of the issues and the harms that Respondents are experiencing every day the unlawful tariffs are in place, Respondents acquiesce in the government's petition for certiorari and its motion for expedited consideration," the companies stated in their high court filing.

Mary Rasenberger, CEO of The Authors Guild, called the deal “a vital step in acknowledging that AI companies cannot simply steal authors' creative work to build their AI just because they need books."

Employment litigation heats up in Washington.

“I look back to the order in this case and say, what, if any, guidance can we find in it?" said Judge William Kayatta of the First Circuit. "There's none that's expressed except the bottom line. So I think, well, what possible reasons could there be for the court's decision?

Legal experts say the real battle over market definition and antitrust theory still lies ahead.

Google has already paid over 8 billion ($9.37 billion) in fines in the European Union—and has now received both the largest and the second-largest EU antitrust fine to date.

This complimentary webcast will provide legal professionals with the practical insights needed to adapt and succeed in this era of change.