State Supreme Court Says Keys in Ignition Is 'Operating Vehicle,' Triggers OUI Law
"Given the changing backdrop of technology in motor vehicles, we hope the decision to hear this case signifies the beginning of what will be further scrutiny of the role intent should play in the definition of operation," said Genevieve Henrique, a solo practitioner representing a driver accused of "operating" a vehicle under the influence.
Embracing Change In Legal Marketing: A Call to Adapt and Lead
Change isn't coming — it's already here. In nearly every corner of business, and particularly in the legal industry, the pace of innovation is accelerating. Marketing and public relations professionals in law firms or those targeting legal clients are standing at a critical crossroads: either resist the wave of change or ride it forward with purpose, agility and creativity.
State Appellate Court Reinstates Teacher's Lawsuit Over Political Divide on Social Media
"We're pleased that the appellate court agreed with us that the Citizens Participation Act was intended as a shield for good faith participation in the political process, and should not be weaponized to enable bad faith, politically motivated, and false allegations of wrongdoing against our heroic teachers free of consequences," Sheryl Weikal said on behalf of the plaintiff.
Know Your Data: Why AI-Driven Information Governance Is Essential
The wave of cyberattacks and data breaches has turned information governance from a compliance afterthought into a required business function. Yet, despite well-publicized threats and skyrocketing costs associated with cyber incidents, most companies remain both underinsured and fundamentally underprepared.
The Curious Persistence of the Six-Factor Trade Secret Test, Part 2
This two-part article discusses the requirements for information to be considered a trade secret under U.S. law, focusing on courts' continued use of the six-factor test outlined in the Restatement of Torts. Part One covered the evolving tests for establishing a trade secret, while Part Two examines the compatibility of those tests and potential considerations for litigators and legislators.