Counsel for national security attorney Mark Zaid allege the White House "summarily revoked" Zaid's security clearance as an act of retribution in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, the First and Fifth amendments and the bill of attainder clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, and opined, “No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates.

After losing more than half of its San Francisco-based litigators to Cooley this month, some say Willkie Farr & Gallagher will have a challenging time recovering.

“It's hard with the shifting landscape to know when/where the next directive or action might come from, said a GC surveyed for the Q2 Business Risk Index. “A safe and steady line of business today might be the focus of a government action tomorrow.

Indiana University Maurer School of Law professor Charles Geyh said any Seventh Circuit judges who worked alongside Richard Posner should step aside. Of the 11 active judges on the court, two served with Posner: Chief Judge Diane Sykes and Judge Frank Easterbrook.

An update on the legal tech market's past week, from product launches to new partnerships.

The justice's speech focused on three top priorities for attorneys in Florida.

As firms continue to tweak comp systems, these changes can ensure less-productive partners don't increase pay without a corresponding increase in performance.

Baby boomers and Generation Z are adapting to gen AI differently when it comes to professional development and learning new skills, according to Thomson Reuters' 2025 Future of Professionals report.

The Supreme Court held, in a 6-3 vote, that a service providing universal broadband and other telecom services to poor and rural areas does not run afoul of a legal doctrine known as "nondelegation."

One proposal drew 30 times the votes of the other, though neither came close to gaining majority support.

In a 6-3 ruling, the court rejected a constitutional challenge to the structure of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which recommends services, like cancer and diabetes screenings, that insurance companies must cover under the Affordable Care Act.

"You can be put in positions to fail. When that's happening, you'll make mistakes. You will. Mistakes that'll make it feel like the world is ending. It's difficult not to lay all of that at your own feet and feel like you're not 'cut out for it.' You have to remember that you are! You got here for a reason. Hold steady and hold your head up high. Move onto the next thing, string some wins together, and you'll be back on the track you want to be on in no time."

The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, granted the Trump administration's request to partially stay nationwide injunctions of President Donald Trump's restrictions on birthright citizenship, finding that district judges lack the authority to issue such broad relief.

"What democracy and civil discourse are about are taking issues and discussing them," Kennedy said. "And this is what judges do, and this is why judges are of central importance.”

In this week's Legal Speak episode, we're kicking off a series where we get to know litigators outside the courtroom through their hobbies. With Texas Lawyer litigation reporter Laura Lorek at the helm, we're sharing inside feedback about what litigators love starting with Dallas-based commercial litigator Tom Walsh of Winston & Strawn.

Candidates already approved for OPT or H-1B status have a leg up, but still face a buyer's market for associate talent.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court's conservative majority said a Maryland school board's decision to deny opt-outs for religious students during such readings likely violates the First Amendment.

A Stanford University analysis shows that 17 licensed ABS entities in Arizona are clearly owned by entities that identify as litigation finance companies, venture capital firms, or private equity firms.

While the court concluded the record could support the inference that Baby Jogger's inaction was misleading, noting that the eight-year period of inactivity was "certainly stretching the limits," it declined to hold that the conduct was misleading as a matter of law.